South Africa’s venture capital market is not “dead” — it’s getting more selective, more structured, and more aligned to global patterns. For founders, that’s good news if you understand how the local ecosystem actually behaves: where capital is flowing, what investors are avoiding, and which legal issues slow deals down.
What the latest data says about the South African VC market
The clearest recent snapshot comes from the 2025 SAVCA VC Survey results for 2024 activity. Southern Africa closed 2024 with R13.35 billion in active VC investments across 1,325 deals, up 24% year-on-year.
During 2024 specifically, R3.29 billion was deployed into startups (including R2.62bn equity), and the survey reported venture debt activity alongside equity for the first time, with R670 million in debt provided.
Two other points matter for founders:
-
Series A is meaningfully back. Series A comprised 42.5% of all deals in 2024 — more than double the prior year’s proportion.
-
Sector concentration is real. ICT drew 65.9% of deal value, with software and fintech among the leading subsectors, while health reached 20% (its highest share since 2015, per the survey commentary).
The implication is simple: if you’re building in software, fintech, or health, you’re fishing where the fish are. If you’re outside those sectors, you need an exceptionally clear story on market size, defensibility, and traction.
South Africa sits inside a broader “Africa VC” cycle
On a continental level, the Africa funding environment has stabilised compared to the post-2022 downturn. Partech reports that Africa’s tech VC in 2024 held relatively steady on equity value at US$2.2B, and that African startups raised around US$3.2B in equity + debt funding (with debt contributing meaningfully).
South Africa also remains one of the “big four” VC destinations on the continent (typically alongside Nigeria, Egypt and Kenya), which helps explain why international investors still keep it on the map when deploying capital into Africa.
The real constraint: exits (and why it affects your round)
Founders often focus on valuation and the pitch deck. Investors often focus on one thing: “How do we get out?”
The same SAVCA-linked reporting notes that exit activity remained a major constraint in 2024, with only three exits recorded, and identifies barriers including follow-on capital constraints and regulatory hurdles such as exchange controls.
Why does that matter to a startup raising now? Because when exits are tight, investors protect themselves through terms: stronger preference structures, tighter governance, more reporting, and sometimes more conservative valuations. In other words, the market becomes “terms-driven”.
What South African founders can do to raise faster and on better terms
Most fundraising delays are not caused by the idea. They’re caused by avoidable friction during due diligence. In South Africa (and especially where there’s cross-border capital), the same themes come up repeatedly:
1) Clean equity and founder arrangements. If there’s any uncertainty about who owns what, what was promised informally, or whether early SAFE/convertible instruments were correctly documented, your round slows down.
2) IP ownership that is boringly clear. Investors want certainty that the company owns the product and underlying IP, including work done by contractors, developers, and prior founders.
3) A governance posture that matches your stage. The local market is showing stronger early-growth (Series A) activity. That stage expects better reporting rhythms, board readiness, and decision discipline than “seed chaos.”
4) A credible cross-border plan (if you’re pitching Africa scale). “Pan-African” is compelling, but investors will interrogate how you’ll handle regulatory variation, contracting, and payments across markets. This is where many pitches become vague.
The bottom line
South Africa’s VC ecosystem is active, but it’s maturing. The capital is there — particularly in tech-adjacent sectors — and the market is showing healthier early-growth behaviour than many founders assume.
But with exits constrained, investors are cautious, and caution shows up in diligence intensity and deal terms.
Founders who prepare legally and structurally don’t just “look investable” — they reduce transaction risk, which is often the deciding factor in whether a term sheet becomes money in the bank.
O’Reilly Law: Venture Capital Support for South African and African Startups
O’Reilly Law advises founders and investors on venture capital raises across South Africa and Africa, from funding readiness and structuring to term sheets, shareholder agreements, and closing.
If you’re raising (or about to), we can help you tighten the structure, anticipate investor pressure points, and negotiate the terms that matter.
📧 info@oreillylaw.co.za
📞 +27 21 948 8273
📍 Cape Town